Rental car costs after a traffic accident

After a traffic accident, your own vehicle may not be available immediately. A rental car can then secure necessary mobility. The invoice is not automatically recoverable simply because an accident occurred and a replacement vehicle was hired.

Rental car costs depend on the concrete need, a reasonable period, the vehicle class and the costs actually incurred. It is equally important to distinguish rental costs from loss of use. A person who uses a replacement vehicle for a period cannot also claim the full loss of use of the damaged vehicle for that same period.

This article explains which documents to collect, how to account for the rental period and which points to examine before making a claim against the liability insurer.

Section 1293 ABGB defines damage as any disadvantage affecting property, rights or a person. Section 1295(1) ABGB provides the basis for compensation where damage was caused culpably. Section 1323 ABGB concerns restoration of the previous situation. Necessary replacement mobility can therefore be examined as a concrete financial loss.

This does not create an automatic claim for every rental. The costs must have been caused by the accident and be objectively justified in the circumstances of the case. A person choosing a replacement vehicle should be able to explain why the previous mobility was needed and why another solution was not equivalent or reasonable.

The section on accidents, traffic and insurance places rental costs within the wider liability and insurance review. Repair costs and diminished value are separate items, explained on the page about property damage and diminished value.

Need depends on the person’s actual life situation. Work, medical appointments, care responsibilities or a remote home may support hiring a car. Private journeys can also matter where public transport cannot provide a comparable solution.

It is not always enough to state a job or a distance. Useful details include the journeys that actually took place, the days on which they were needed, available bus or rail connections and whether another household vehicle was available. A short record of daily mobility can prevent later contradictions.

The assessment is not based on an ideal solution invented after the event. It asks which decision was sensible and economically reasonable in the circumstances at the time.

The rental period does not necessarily begin at the moment of the accident and does not automatically end only when the final repair invoice is issued. The relevant question is when the damaged vehicle was actually unavailable and when replacement mobility remained necessary. Record the accident, inspection, approval, parts order, repair completion and return.

Delays need an explanation. Was the inspection arranged late? Were parts unavailable? Did the repair plan change after an expert report? Connect each relevant cause to an email, workshop confirmation, order or other record.

A total loss requires a separate view of replacement procurement. Keep records of searches for an equivalent vehicle, viewings and the date when a replacement solution was actually available. A flat rental period is difficult to assess without these facts.

The invoice contains more than a daily price. Check rental days, vehicle class, mileage rule, excess, delivery, collection, additional drivers, fuel and insurance items. Each item should be clear from the agreement or invoice and connected to the actual rental.

The vehicle class should fit the damaged vehicle and the concrete need. A more expensive replacement can require additional explanation. A smaller vehicle may be sufficient if it provides equivalent mobility. The relevant solution is not the most comfortable one, but a suitable and economically reasonable one.

Compare the invoice with proof of payment. If a discount, excess or insurer settlement was agreed, show it clearly in the claim. Unexplained combined amounts make review more difficult.

Rental costs compensate concrete expenditure for a replacement vehicle. Loss of use concerns the lost ability to use the damaged vehicle where no replacement was used. The two items have different requirements and should not both be claimed in full for the same period.

A simple daily schedule is enough to start the distinction. Record when the damaged vehicle became unavailable, when the rental car was collected, when it was returned and whether there were interruptions. Include days on which the own vehicle was already available again.

Further information on vehicle loss of use is available on the page about property damage and diminished value. The supporting documents should nevertheless remain separate.

If the liability insurer reduces the claim, ask for the concrete calculation. Request the recognised period, vehicle class, tariff and deducted extras. A general explanation does not show whether the disagreement concerns need, duration, amount or liability.

Set out the reduction in a clear table with item, period, document, claimed amount, recognised amount and open reason. This makes the actual point of disagreement visible.

The damage documentation check helps organise the first review. The claim check can help classify the claim. Neither replaces an assessment of the concrete liability and evidence.

Collect the accident report, photographs, registration, expert report, repair order and correspondence with the other party’s liability insurer. For the rental, add the agreement, invoice, payment record, handover and return details and a list of the days used.

Record the concrete mobility need. Working hours, care appointments, medical visits, family journeys and public transport connections can explain the choice. Information about other household vehicles should also be recorded objectively.

Arrange the documents chronologically. A complete timeline makes it easier to compare rental start, repair progress and return. The accident documentation checklist provides additional guidance.

A frequent mistake is charging the entire period from the accident to the final workshop invoice without explaining the actual availability of the rental car or the own vehicle. An invoice that does not explain the vehicle class, extras or tariff changes is also difficult to review.

Another mistake is mixing rental costs, loss of use, repair costs and diminished value. Each item should be presented with its own period, requirement and document. A short rental may still raise questions about necessity if no concrete need is described.

Comparing realistic offers before hiring and briefly recording the choice creates a better basis for later review. The file should describe what actually happened, not an ideal story created afterwards.

You can receive new articles and legal information from the firm through BRANDaktuellen Rechtsnews. Subscribe to the newsletter.