Towing and recovery costs after an accident as consequential loss

After a traffic accident, the repair of the vehicle is often only one part of the loss. The vehicle may have to be removed from a dangerous location, recovered from difficult terrain or stored until it can be inspected and moved. These invoices are often accepted or reduced without separating the individual reasons for the charge.

Towing and recovery costs may qualify as accident-related consequential loss. The invoice alone does not settle the question. The measure must have been necessary, its scope must have been reasonable and the amount must be comprehensible.

Section 1323 ABGB focuses on restoring the previous condition. The assessment also requires attention to mitigation, the vehicle’s condition, the destination and the distinction between towing, recovery, storage, repair and loss of use.

A vehicle that is not roadworthy or safe cannot simply remain at the accident scene. Towing may remove a danger, prevent further damage and bring the vehicle to a suitable location. That connection with the accident does not, however, make every amount recoverable automatically.

The specific situation and reasonable alternatives matter. Was the vehicle blocking traffic? Was there a danger? Did it have to go to a workshop, a safe parking place or an inspection? The answer depends on the circumstances on the day. There is no single distance or flat amount that decides every case.

OGH headnote RS0027015 states that an injured party must take necessary and reasonable measures to mitigate the loss, regardless of the wrongdoer’s conduct. This also matters where an unnecessarily long transport or avoidable extra service increases the bill. The topic page on accidents, traffic and insurance provides further orientation.

The invoice mileage is not the only issue. The reason for selecting the destination matters. A nearby suitable workshop may be the obvious choice if it can accept the vehicle. A longer trip to a particular workshop may also be understandable where a necessary inspection or an agreed repair is to take place there.

The invoice should show when and where the vehicle was collected and where it was taken. Add the service report, roadside-assistance record, photographs and correspondence with the workshop or insurer. This helps show whether the transport served safety and damage control or whether a later personal preference determined the destination.

In RS0030451, the OGH states that the amount payable for a total loss is assessed independently of whether and to what extent towing costs are recoverable. Towing is therefore a separate item. It is not automatically resolved by the total-loss calculation and should not disappear into it without explanation.

Recovery costs arise where the vehicle cannot simply be removed from the road in an ordinary towing operation. This may occur after an accident in a ditch, on an embankment, on inaccessible ground or after a collision with an obstacle. Special equipment, winches or additional personnel may then be necessary.

The invoice should describe the work in sufficient detail. A single unexplained amount is difficult to assess. Ask for the service report and keep photographs of the accident location and recovery. They can show why the chosen method was required.

Not every later improvement to the vehicle is recovery. Clearing the accident scene, securing leaked fluids or removing vehicle parts may have a direct accident connection. Repairs, cleaning, preparation or extended storage should be recorded separately.

After towing, charges may arise for parking or holding the vehicle. Duration and reason are particularly important. Short-term security until inspection or a repair decision is different from a longer period in which no collection or further instruction takes place.

Record the start and end of storage, the location, the daily rate and the people involved. If the insurer announced an inspection or delayed authorisation, keep that correspondence. Conversely, an avoidable delay in collecting the vehicle may explain a reduction of the additional charges.

Storage fees are not an automatic consequence of every vehicle accident. They need a factual connection with the accident handling and must be plausible in amount. Keep them separate from repair, loss of use and replacement-vehicle costs.

Towing and recovery concern immediate safety and removal of the vehicle. Repair costs concern restoration. Loss of use or rental costs concern the period when the vehicle was unavailable. Expert costs concern technical or legal assessment. These items may coexist, but they have different requirements.

A clear schedule prevents double counting. For each item, record the date, reason, service, invoice and connection with the accident. The damage documentation check helps organise photographs, reports and invoices. The overview on property damage and diminished value helps separate vehicle-related losses.

If the vehicle is later classified as a total loss, the costs that were necessary up to that point still require separate examination. A later total-loss assessment does not automatically erase earlier necessary work. Conversely, an unnecessary extra service does not become recoverable merely because it occurred after the accident.

Collect the accident report, photographs of the scene, service or recovery report, towing order, invoice, proof of payment and correspondence with the workshop and insurer. Photographs are especially useful where the vehicle was inaccessible. For storage costs, the start, end and daily rate should be clear.

Check the invoice for inconsistencies. Do the accident and collection locations match? Are extra hours explained? Are equipment, personnel and travel separated? Does the bill include work that belongs to repair or cleaning instead? A focused request for clarification can resolve issues early.

The damage documents checklist supports the collection of evidence. If the other side disputes the costs, request the specific reason and the comparison calculation rather than arguing only from the final total.

Prepare a short chronology: accident, securing, towing, recovery, storage, inspection and the next decision. Add the amount and document for each expense. This shows which costs were immediately necessary and where duration or an alternative may be discussed.

If the insurer reduces an item, request the calculation and specific reason. Provide not only the invoice but also the circumstances explaining the work. If liability is divided, distinguish a reduction based on the necessity of the measure from a reduction based on the claimant’s share of responsibility.

The accident facts, liability, individual items and dates should be brought together. The guidance on evidence, negotiation and limitation explains why complete documentation should be prepared early.

New articles and legal information from the firm are available through BRANDaktuellen Rechtsnews. Subscribe to the newsletter.