Disfigurement compensation after personal injury: when is it available?

A conspicuous scar, the loss of a body part or another substantial change in external appearance may create a separate damages claim in addition to compensation for pain and suffering. Austrian law refers to this claim as disfigurement compensation under section 1326 ABGB. It does not simply compensate emotional pain. It concerns the possibility that the changed appearance may impair the injured person’s future advancement.

Several questions must be kept separate: How has the appearance changed? Is the change substantial and adverse? Is it visible on a normally clothed person or does it affect the person in another way? Which professional, personal or social opportunities may be made more difficult? Which consequences instead belong to pain compensation or loss of earnings?

The OGH does not apply a rigid formula. Under its case law, the concrete possibility of impaired advancement may be sufficient. That possibility must nevertheless be assessed in the individual circumstances. The extent, type and location of the change, age, occupation, living conditions and likely effects must be considered together.

Section 1326 ABGB concerns disfigurement caused by an injury. The wording of the provision comes from an earlier period and contains historical language. For practical purposes, the substance is what matters: the external appearance must have changed substantially for the worse through the injury, and this may impair the person’s future advancement.

The claim has a different function from pain and suffering compensation. Pain compensation addresses physical and psychological pain arising from the injury and its consequences. Disfigurement compensation focuses on the possible effect of the changed appearance on future opportunities and development. Both heads may be relevant, but the same facts must not be used to justify double recovery.

The law does not require the change to be immediately noticeable under every item of clothing. The OGH has expressly held that a disfigurement need not be visible on a normally clothed person. The decisive issues are the substantial adverse change in appearance and its assessed effect on advancement.

A disfigurement may be an adverse change in appearance, such as a conspicuous scar, visible asymmetry, loss of an organ or another lasting or temporary alteration. The label alone is not decisive. A small change may be significant in an individual case, while a visible but minor change may not be enough.

Relevant factors include the location, size, shape, contrast, mobility and visibility of the change. A scar on the face, hands or another body area frequently visible in everyday life may have a different effect from a change that is usually covered. Covering does not automatically exclude a claim.

Under the case law, the claim does not necessarily require a permanent disfigurement. The healing process and expected development must therefore be documented. If healing is incomplete, it must be assessed whether a substantial change is already established, how likely improvement is and whether further surgery is planned.

Future advancement is not limited to a possible professional promotion. The case law understands it broadly as the risk that an improvement in the person’s situation that would otherwise be possible may fail because of the adverse change in appearance. This can concern professional opportunities, applications, customer contact, public roles, social relationships or other concrete areas of life.

A general concern about appearing less attractive will usually not provide a sufficient basis. At the same time, an actual career loss does not have to have already occurred. The case law accepts a possibility of impairment, but requires an assessment based on the individual circumstances.

Relevant factors can include occupation, education, planned work, regular public or customer contact, age and concrete life plans. A child’s later development naturally cannot be predicted with the same precision. The OGH nevertheless recognises that the possibility of future impairment can be examined in such cases.

Compensation for pain and suffering under section 1325 ABGB covers physical and psychological pain. A disfigurement may be considered when assessing that compensation. In addition, section 1326 ABGB may support a separate award where the change creates a possibility of impaired advancement. The facts must therefore be allocated clearly to the respective heads of loss.

Loss of earnings concerns an economic shortfall, for example where work capacity falls or a specific job can no longer be performed. Disfigurement compensation does not require an income loss to have already occurred. It focuses on the possible adverse development of the person’s situation because of the changed appearance.

Treatment costs, surgery, care and future medical treatment must also be recorded separately. A useful damages overview states the period, cause, amount and supporting document for each item. The guidance on personal injury and recovery costs helps with the initial organisation.

Findings, operation reports, discharge letters, dated photographs and, where appropriate, a specialist description are important evidence of the external change. Photographs should document the healing process over time rather than only one condition. If corrective surgery is planned, its purpose, prospects and timing should also be recorded.

Concrete indications are needed for future advancement. These may include occupation, applications, customer contact, appearance-related job requirements, evidence of actual reactions and a coherent description of planned development. General statements do not replace this assessment.

The amount is not determined by a rigid table. The extent of the disfigurement, the type of injury and the probability of impaired advancement are central factors. The damage documents checklist helps collect medical records, photographs and economic consequences separately.

If treatment is still ongoing, the assessment should take the healing process into account without delaying necessary medical care. Keep photographs, findings and invoices continuously. If the appearance changes, continue the documentation.

Section 1489 ABGB generally provides a three-year limitation period for damages claims from knowledge of the damage and the person responsible. With disfigurement, the point at which the extent became sufficiently known may be difficult to determine. The specific period depends on the facts, so an early timeline review is sensible.

Arrange the accident or harmful event, first treatment, beginning of the visible change, operations, corrective procedures and communication with the liable person or insurer in one timeline. The guidance on evidence, negotiation and limitation explains how to structure these records.

A common error is to treat every visible scar automatically as a claim under section 1326 ABGB. There must be a substantial adverse change and a possibility of impaired advancement. Both must be made understandable from the circumstances of the case.

It is also problematic to describe only the emotional burden. That may matter for pain compensation. Section 1326 additionally requires consideration of which future opportunities may be made more difficult because of the external change.

Finally, current photographs, medical findings and the prognosis are often not collected. Without a chronological record, it remains unclear whether a change is still healing, how it is developing and what treatment is pending. Keep all documents in one coherent timeline.

Receive new articles and legal information from the firm with BRANDaktuellen Rechtsnews. Subscribe to the newsletter.